Bloomberg's Vague Blueprint - Response In this Op-Ed Julius Tajiddin responds to an interview of Mayor Michael Bloomberg by the Amsterdam News (located in the Village of Harlem in New York City). Tajiddin covers Charter Schools, Residency Requirements and Police Relationships in predominantly Black and minority areas of New York City. Tajiddin's reponse regarding Police Relationships is very timely given the recent news stories about Reverend Calvin Butts' experience with the local Police.Bloomberg's Vague Blueprint - ResponseOr(Bloomberg Talks a Good Game...) By: Julius Tajiddin 
Op-Ed Category Image
           When I read that Bloomberg stated in his interview with the Amsterdam News, “Charter schools are the private schools for the minority community,” I said to myself, “How dare he.” Who says? However, I’ll agree with him to this extent. Many people in the Black and Latino community believe that a charter school is some sort of private school. That’s because many people are uninformed of what a charter school is all about and the process for enrollment as it sometimes is, is by lottery. So people have a false perception of what a charter school is. Those who know are not convinced that a charter school is any better than a regular public school.? Read more...


Charter Schools & Gentrification How Charter Schools will be used to Gentrify Harlem! – The Silent CoupBy: Julius Tajiddin and Denise Saddler
Op-Ed Category Image
            What is a Charter School? Most people really don’t know. Many think that a charter school is some sort of private school. However, the general public perception of a Charter School is: If your child is selected to be in one he/she is going to get a better education than in a regular Public School.? Read more...


Home arrow Thoughts
9:47:59 AM

Thoughts

Why Does The Community Accept This Treatment?? 

By By The Bridge
December 4th, 2006

Realizing the irony of it all, I read a New York Time?s article in December 2005 titled ?Room 117, Awash in Color and Light, Restoring Vivid Palette of Library?s Map Chamber?. The article was about the then new Map Room at the Main New York Public Library Building located on West 42nd Street and reported that the New York Public Library (NYPL) spent 2.5 million dollars of public funds, on that one room. Earlier this year, about a month later in January, the New York Times reported about all the pomp and circumstance surrounding a new Library Center in the Bronx titled ?New Bronx Library Meets Old Need; High-Tech Now, but Still Serving Immigrants?. The New York Public Library apparently spent collectively $50 million dollars on that particular library.

New York Public Library honchos Paul LeClerc, President & CEO and Susan Kent, Director & Chief Executive of the Branch Libraries appeared to be in almost all, if not all, the television news reports about the new Bronx Library. This was interesting because they do not appear to be available to simple community folk like myself who can never get past administrative secretaries who act like ?line backers? blocking any access to either of them.

The Macomb’s Bridge Branch Library has been in a studio apartment sized space for sixty plus years, despite the population growth of and public use by the local ?North Harlem? community. Community Residents, including Children and Elders have had to go all the way to the Countee Cullen Branch Library (on West 136th Street near Lenox Avenue) and up hills to the Hamilton Grange Branch Library (on West 145th Street near Amsterdam Avenue) and the Washington Heights Branch Library (on St. Nicholas Avenue and West 160th Street) for more serious and in-depth studies and investigations. Often, because of the distance, they must spend money on public transportation to get to these other branches. The library also only has one public door to enter and exit the library associated with a narrowed walkway.

As I read and watched television reports about these ?events? I kept asking myself ?Why does the community, accept being treated this way??

In trying to understand the persistence of this problem, the following questions display boldly in the mind:

  • Are we as a people, as a community still in the ?take what you can get and be glad for it? mentality of the pre-civil rights era? Or, is the New York Public Library, Politicians and/or Community Board* ?stuck? in that mentality?
  • With all that Blacks and Latinos have achieved in New York City these past sixty plus years, how in the world is there still a studio apartment sized library in our community?
  • With all the public conversation and created programs that are suppose to be addressing the improvement of literacy in communities with little or no wealth how can this exist?
  • How can the leadership at the New York Public Library not be actively engaging the community in changing this very sorry situation in a way that does not endanger the community and ?side step? phone calls addressing this?
  • Why has the Community Board minimalized the problem, been lax in seriously addressing this problem, and not worked directly with the community to solve the problem in a way that benefits the community?
  • Why are the local politicians who should have been actively engaging the community about this situation and actively in the process of finding a safe site location for a new library and the money to build it been soooo laid back about it?

It could just plainly be (and I know this may be emotionally painful for the community to accept) that the NYPL, the Community Board and politicians just do not care because the issue does not affect the bulk of the populations they are purported to serve. Could it be the community’s fear of being publicly ?belittled? and ?blacklisted? by the NYPL, Community Board and politicians (after complaining about issues that are not popular or important to these entities and/or writing up political office staff members that display indifference and indicate ?they don’t have time? to follow up on important community problems). Could it be a perception by the NYPL and politicians that the North Harlem community does not contribute enough to them financially? Or, could it also be the appearance that the ?Valley? community is willing to accept a possibly unsafe situation and rationalize to itself it is all it should expect from an inattentive and uncaring NYPL, Community Board and politicians all these years? - Just A Thought

NOTE: Although the above ?Thoughts? editorial is focused on examining why the North Harlem community has accepted so little regarding the need for a new library over the years, the community now needs a Combined Macomb’s Bridge Branch Library ? Multi-use Facility. ?Thoughts? will be addressing that need in the future.

———————

MENTIONED IN ?THOUGHTS?

Collins, Glenn. “Room 117, Awash in Color and Light, Restoring Vivid Palette of Library?s Map Chamber.” New York Times 12 Dec. 2005, late ed.: B1

Collins, Glenn. “New Bronx Library Meets Old Need; High-Tech Now, but Still Serving Immigrants” New York Times 16 Jan. 2006, late ed.: B1

“Macomb’s Bridge Branch Information.” New York Public Library. 3 Dec. 2006

Comments are closed.



Side Thoughts

BlogrollCategoriesArchives

Recommend

 this page
 the main page

TERMS OF USE || PRIVACY POLICY || COPYRIGHT || DISCLAIMER

Copyright (C) 2006 Friends of the Macombs Bridge Branch Library All rights reserved.